<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Motor Defence Solicitors &#187; congestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/tag/congestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic traffic congestion could be 33% higher</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2012/01/olympic-traffic-congestion-could-be-33-higher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2012/01/olympic-traffic-congestion-could-be-33-higher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 11:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/?p=1620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A leading supplier of traffic information services predicts that the Olympic Games could increase congestion in London by 33% The report, based on existing traffic models, shows that core London routes will slow to an average speed of 12mph during July and August. The opening ceremony of the event even clashes with the busiest holiday [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A leading supplier of traffic information services predicts that the Olympic Games could increase congestion in London by 33%<span id="more-1620"></span></p>
<p>The report, based on existing traffic models, shows that core London routes will slow to an average speed of 12mph during July and August. The opening ceremony of the event even clashes with the busiest holiday getaway day of the year, July 27th, when traffic levels are already 30% higher.</p>
<p>In addition the first event after the ceremony is the Men&#8217;s Road Cycling Race which is scheduled to close roads in South West London and Surrey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2012/01/olympic-traffic-congestion-could-be-33-higher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sat nav reveals congested roads</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/10/sat-nav-reveals-congested-roads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/10/sat-nav-reveals-congested-roads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/?p=935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sat nav boffins at TomTom conducted a two year study into which of Britain&#8217;s roads were the most congested Bedford Road in Clapham, London is congested for more than 13 hours a day making it the worst road in Britain for traffic jams. The top 25 worst roads all suffered from at least 12 hours [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sat nav boffins at TomTom conducted a two year study into which of Britain&#8217;s roads were the most congested<span id="more-935"></span></p>
<p>Bedford Road in Clapham, London is congested for more than 13 hours a day making it the worst road in Britain for traffic jams. The top 25 worst roads all suffered from at least 12 hours of congestion a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/10/sat-nav-reveals-congested-roads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Britain&#8217;s most depressing roads revealed</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/08/britains-most-depressing-roads-revealed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/08/britains-most-depressing-roads-revealed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 10:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[potholes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorcycle News conducted a survey of 3,000 drivers and bikers to reveal the UK&#8217;s most depressing roads Unsurprisingly the M25 tops the list, prone to congestion and just being a boring road to drive on. The M6 in Birmingham and A1 in London came a close second and third. The three most common issues that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorcycle News conducted a survey of 3,000 drivers and bikers to reveal the UK&#8217;s most depressing roads<span id="more-855"></span></p>
<p>Unsurprisingly the M25 tops the list, prone to congestion and just being a boring road to drive on. The M6 in Birmingham and A1 in London came a close second and third. The three most common issues that were given for nominating a road as dull were speed cameras, congestion and potholes. 65% of drivers stated that driving had become more stressful in the last two years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2010/08/britains-most-depressing-roads-revealed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DfT Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/11/dft-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/11/dft-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department for Transport has released provisional statistics for road traffic and congestion in the third quarter of 2009 Compared to the same quarter in 2008, the statistics have the following highlights: Car traffic increased by 1 per cent. Light van traffic increased by 3 per cent. Heavy goods vehicle traffic decreased by 7 per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department for Transport has released provisional statistics for road traffic and congestion in the third quarter of 2009<span id="more-306"></span></p>
<p>Compared to the same quarter in 2008, the statistics have the following highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>Car traffic increased by 1 per cent.</li>
<li>Light van traffic increased by 3 per cent.</li>
<li>Heavy goods vehicle traffic decreased by 7 per cent.</li>
<li>Traffic on motorways increased by 1 per cent.</li>
<li>Traffic on rural &#8216;A&#8217; roads increased by 1 per cent.</li>
<li>Traffic on urban &#8216;A&#8217; roads increased by 1 per cent.</li>
<li>Traffic on minor rural roads was unchanged.</li>
<li>Traffic on minor urban roads decreased by 1 per cent.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/11/dft-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US refuse congestion charge</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/08/us-refuse-congestion-charge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/08/us-refuse-congestion-charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/news/697/15/US-refuse-congestion-charge.htm</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[United States ambassadors in London are refusing to pay up the Â£3 million in congestion charge fines owed Boris Johnson was hopeful that the Government would recoup the fines from America when they changed their London ambassador. The US still refuses to pay for the fine, saying that it is a tax which is ignored [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>United States ambassadors in London are refusing to pay up the Â£3 million in congestion charge fines owed<span id="more-10"></span></p>
<p>Boris Johnson was hopeful that the Government would recoup the fines from America when they changed their London ambassador. The US still refuses to pay for the fine, saying that it is a tax which is ignored under certain diplomatic treaties. The US is not alone in their congestion charge debt. Russia owes Â£2.6 million, Japan Â£2.3 million. British officials in the states still have to pay their road tolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/08/us-refuse-congestion-charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alternative travel city</title>
		<link>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/05/alternative-travel-city/</link>
		<comments>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/05/alternative-travel-city/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congestion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the worst cities in England for congestion are to get a grant to promote alternative forms of transport£29 million will be invested in at least one of the following areas; Greater Manchester, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear, Merseyside, West of England (Bristol), Nottingham and Leicester. They will have to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the worst cities in England for congestion are to get a grant to promote alternative forms of transport<span id="more-595"></span>£29 million will be invested in at least one of the following areas; Greater Manchester, West Midlands, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Tyne and Wear, Merseyside, West of England (Bristol), Nottingham and Leicester. They will have to submit plans on how the propose to promote walking, cycling and public transport to be successful in their bid. The investment follows from a sustainable travel town initiative which has shown that car use fell by 9%, walking increased by 14% and cycling increased by 12%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.motordefenceteam.co.uk/blog/2009/05/alternative-travel-city/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

